Togo’s 2024 Constitutional Reform: A Shift to Parliamentary Governance Sparks Controversy

Togo’s 2024 constitutional reform proposes a shift from a presidential to a parliamentary system, prompting intense opposition and accusations of a constitutional coup. While opposition leaders argue against the move, claiming it undermines democratic principles, government officials assert that the reforms enhance democratic participation. The debate signifies ongoing political tensions in Togo.

In 2024, Togo has entered a significant political controversy regarding proposed constitutional reforms that would transition the country from a presidential to a parliamentary system. This change stipulates that the head of state will be elected by lawmakers rather than directly by the populace, prompting fierce backlash from various political entities and civil society groups. Accusations of a constitutional coup and fears of a decline in democratic standards have amplified opposition sentiments.

The President of the National Alliance for Change (ANC), Jean-Pierre Fabre, has vocally opposed the reforms, asserting they contravene existing constitutional provisions. He stated, “Enough is enough, it’s over. We’re going to fight. Everyone knows that they violated Articles 52 and 59 (of the constitution).” His sentiments reflect widespread discontent among opposition members regarding the government’s maneuvering.

David Dosseh, spokesperson for the Front Citoyen Togo Debout (FCTD), also criticized the move, describing it as a blatant coup d’état. He claimed, “Today, there’s a constitutional coup d’état taking place with impunity in Togo. But this time, we’re not going to accept it.” This condemnation underscores the urgency felt by opposition groups in defending democratic integrity.

Further amplifying the dissent, Brigitte Kafui Adjamagbo-Johnson, a key figure in the ‘Don’t Touch My Constitution!’ Front, denounced the legitimacy of the reform. She commented, “We do not recognise this constitution. However, if they insist and present it to us, our response is very simple,” hinting at an organized resistance to the proposed changes.

In contrast, the ruling Union for the Republic (UNIR) party has defended the reforms, arguing that they promote greater democratic participation and governance. Kouméalo Anaté, a UNIR lawmaker, stated, “Togo has just opened a new page in its march towards a country that is, shall we say, an even more inclusive and participatory democracy.” This perspective indicates a divergence in viewpoints between the government and its critics.

Vice President of the UNIR parliamentary group, Sénou Soklingbé, dismissed fears of the reform being a means to extend presidential power indefinitely. He explained, “No one can say that everything is done to ensure that the President of the Republic, if he were to become the President of the Council tomorrow, remains indefinitely in power. It is the majority of the National Assembly that determines who will be the President of the Council.”

The constitutional reform in Togo has triggered significant political strife, with opposition leaders labeling it a constitutional coup. In contrast, the ruling party defends the initiative as a step towards enhancing democracy. The situation reflects a deepening divide between government authorities and opposition factions over the future of governance in Togo.

Original Source: globalsouthworld.com