British Veterans Respond Strongly to JD Vance’s Dismissive Remarks about War Dead

The article discusses backlash from British veterans against JD Vance for remarks denigrating the UK’s military contributions, specifically referencing the 636 fatalities in Iraq and Afghanistan. Prominent military figures criticized Vance for his lack of respect and understanding of the sacrifices made by British forces. The article details the historical context of military operations involving the UK and the US in both conflicts, emphasizing the need for recognition of these sacrifices.

British military veterans have responded fiercely to JD Vance, who recently made dismissive comments about the United Kingdom’s casualties in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Vance, the U.S. Vice President, referred to Britain as “some random country that hasn’t fought a war in 30 or 40 years,” prompting outrage. Former Veterans Minister Johnny Mercer and SAS hero Andy McNab both called for respect towards the sacrifices made by British forces. McNab suggested that Vance should familiarize himself with the names of British war dead to understand their significance alongside U.S. troops.

General Sir Patrick Sanders expressed his disagreement with Vance’s comments, underscoring the joint efforts of U.S. and British forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. He added that public criticism could further complicate political matters at a time when unity is essential. Meanwhile, former British soldier Shaun Pinner, who served in Ukraine, condemned Vance’s remarks and suggested they demonstrate ignorance of actual warfare. He emphasized the brutality of modern combat, contrasting it with America’s historical experiences.

Ex-Royal Marine Ben McBean, who suffered serious injuries in Afghanistan, harshly criticized Vance, asserting that the latter’s military experience was deeply disconnected from the realities faced by soldiers. McBean challenged Vance’s credibility, stating that his assignment focused on public relations instead of actual combat. Similarly, former First Sea Lord Admiral Lord West described Vance’s comments as “utterly disgraceful,” highlighting the significant loss of British lives in both conflicts, and characterized Vance as offensive given his minimal combat experience.

Questions about Vance’s understanding of military matters emerged, with General the Lord Richard Dannatt referencing the need for Vance to appreciate the sacrifices made by British forces during these operations. The article underscores the significance of the 636 British lives lost across various conflicts, specifically in Iraq and Afghanistan, noting that British troops fought alongside U.S. forces in significant operations such as the War on Terror, which began following the September 11 attacks.

The UK’s involvement in Afghanistan began in 2001, leading to numerous fatalities and a protracted campaign aimed at stabilizing the region post-Taliban. In Iraq, British troops were part of a larger coalition, with the conflict resulting in 179 British deaths amidst efforts to counter insurgency and restore security after the regime’s downfall. Ultimately, the article emphasizes the critical need for respect and recognition of the sacrifices made by service members in these conflicts.

British military personnel and veterans have firmly rebutted JD Vance’s disparaging comments regarding the UK’s contributions and sacrifices in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. The strong responses from veterans and military leaders highlight the importance of acknowledging the profound losses incurred by British forces and affirming their commitment to their allies. Vance’s insistence on dismissing the sacrifices made by 636 British war dead reveals a significant discord in understanding the complexities of international military operations and partnerships.

Original Source: www.the-sun.com