Broadcast Bias: Networks Favoring Gangsters Over Victims

This article critiques major networks ABC, CBS, and NBC for their biased coverage of deportations concerning Venezuelan gangsters, portraying them as victims while neglecting discussions of violence against American citizens. The coverage highlights judicial opposition to Trump’s policies, often favoring figures like Judge Boasberg, while failing to recognize the successes of Trump’s immigration policies. The article argues that network coverage remains predominantly negative towards Trump, creating a distorted narrative.

This week, major networks ABC, CBS, and NBC displayed a tendency to advocate for Venezuelan gangsters rather than report objectively, drawing parallels to their previous behavior towards pro-Hamas individuals. The media seems to label anyone deported under Trump as an innocent victim, regardless of their criminal actions. Similarly, any judicial challenges against Trump’s policies are framed favorably for the judges involved, such as District Judge James Boasberg, who was praised for blocking deportations but was notably appointed by President Barack Obama.

President Trump and his administration have identified the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua as a significant threat after their takeover of several apartment buildings. In a conversation on ABC’s “This Week,” anchor Martha Raddatz confronted J.D. Vance about minimizing the gang’s actions, to which Vance countered with a question regarding the safety of her own home. The networks’ narrative progresses as they aggressively cover alleged criminal activities by migrants while downplaying any resultant violence in American communities.

Furthermore, news reports described the deportations of Venezuelan gang members as “controversial” and likened Trump’s actions to historical internment practices. The networks neglect to mention that Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, was responsible for the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. ABC’s George Stephanopoulos characterized the deportation directive as a denial of due process, echoing a recurring theme among network coverage that depicts such policies with historical negativity.

As narratives unfold, the broadcast networks draw unsettling parallels between current deportations and instances of past immigrant discrimination against Irish Americans, with CBS Evening News exploring this historical context. Reports claim that if the ACLU had existed then, it might have opposed historical deportations similarly to its current stance against Trump’s administration. Questions were raised by ABC and NBC reporters regarding the continuation of deportation flights, reflecting a notable preference for Biden’s immigration policies and skepticism towards any deportation efforts.

Despite the ongoing critical coverage of Trump, illegal immigration has reportedly decreased significantly, a fact the networks seem reluctant to acknowledge. This suggests a bias in shaping news narratives that portray Trump in a consistently negative light, with past analysis suggesting that approximately 90% of coverage was unfavorable, in contrast to a more positive portrayal of President Biden’s actions surrounding immigration and border security.

In conclusion, the bias exhibited by major networks ABC, CBS, and NBC in their coverage of deportations emphasizes a narrative that favors criminals over victims. The focus on judicial opposition to Trump’s policies and historical comparisons to internment reflects a significant disconnect from public concerns about crime related to illegal immigration. Moreover, the networks’ reluctance to acknowledge reductions in illegal immigration underscores a broader trend in media bias, which consistently frames Trump’s actions negatively while offering a more favorable light on Biden’s administration. Overall, this analysis reveals an ongoing challenge in objective reporting within broadcast news.

Original Source: www.foxnews.com