Critical Insights on Diplomacy: Russia’s Perspective on US and Middle Eastern Conflicts

Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia’s UN representative, criticized the Biden administration for exacerbating the Ukraine conflict and praised Trump’s realist approach. He recognized Saudi Arabia’s emerging role in global diplomacy, particularly in resolving conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. Polyanskiy also discussed Russia’s stance on Sudan and Syria, affirming support for local authorities and the need for comprehensive solutions.

The administration of former U.S. President Joe Biden has been criticized by Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia’s first deputy permanent representative to the UN. In an interview, Polyanskiy emphasized that rather than resolving the Ukraine conflict, the previous U.S. administration exacerbated it.

He indicated that a change in what he termed “optics” could have resolved the conflict earlier, arguing that the Biden administration fueled the war and perpetuated anti-Russian sentiment. This escalated tensions, culminating in Moscow’s military operation in February 2022.

Polyanskiy contrasted this with the perspective of former President Donald Trump’s administration, which he believes adopted a more realistic approach. He commended Trump for understanding the battlefield dynamics and promoting proposals aimed at de-escalating hostilities, particularly beneficial for Ukraine.

Following recent discussions in Riyadh, which sought to broker a ceasefire in exchange for eased sanctions on Russia, Polyanskiy lauded Saudi Arabia’s evolving diplomatic role. He expressed confidence that Riyadh is becoming a new center for diplomacy amidst changing global dynamics.

He further acknowledged Saudi Arabia’s positive engagement, stating that their efforts in facilitating discussions among the U.S., Russia, and Ukraine are invaluable. The talks signal a hopeful future for Riyadh as a pivotal diplomatic capital, especially regarding the ongoing conflict.

Expanding the dialogue scope, Polyanskiy addressed issues beyond Ukraine, including the Gaza conflict. He recognized Russia’s limited leverage compared to the U.S. in influencing Israel’s actions but underscored the importance of unified efforts among Arab countries to mobilize support for the Palestinian cause.

He championed a two-state solution as essential and criticized past normalization efforts between Arab nations and Israel that overlooked Palestinian concerns. Polyanskiy reflected on the necessity of re-engaging with the historical approach employed by the Middle East Quartet for successful mediation in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In discussing the Sudan conflict, Polyanskiy voiced Russian support for the Sudanese authorities amid ongoing struggles since April 2023. He expressed optimism about military developments in Sudan and reiterated Russia’s stance against foreign interference in the region’s internal affairs.

Polyanskiy also observed the challenges faced in Syria, noting Russia’s ongoing commitment to supporting stability post-Assad regime. He expressed the desired outcome of inclusive authorities collaborating against terrorism while emphasizing the longstanding ties between Russia and Syria, which could benefit mutual assistance during transitional periods.

In conclusion, Dmitry Polyanskiy’s assertions regarding the geopolitical landscape reflect a complex interplay of diplomacy, conflict, and international relations. His perspectives highlight the contrasting approaches of past and present U.S. administrations, Russia’s support for regional authorities, and the ramifications of diplomatic engagements in the Middle East. The evolution of Saudi Arabia as a diplomatic hub and the calls for broader regional cooperation signal significant developments in addressing longstanding conflicts.

Original Source: www.arabnews.pk