Ukraine Condemns Russia’s Presidency of the UN Security Council as Unjust

Ukraine denounces Russia’s presidency of the UN Security Council in April as a significant affront to the international community, amidst rising tensions from the ongoing invasion of Ukraine. Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba has urged member states to prevent Russia from abusing its temporary power. Concerns are shared among the U.S. and Baltic states regarding the implications of Russia’s presidency on the UNSC’s credibility.

Ukraine has condemned Russia’s presidency of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) for April 2023, referring to it as a “slap in the face” to the international community. This condemnation arises amidst the backdrop of significant tension between Moscow and the West due to the ongoing conflict following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba voiced strong opposition, urging other UNSC members to prevent Russia’s exploitation of its presidency, labeling the nation as “an outlaw on the UNSC.” Notably, Russia last led the council in February 2022, coinciding with its invasion of Ukraine, prompting calls for Russia’s removal from this esteemed body.

Although Moscow will lead the council’s agenda during its presidency, it is anticipated that the nation’s influence over decisions will be limited. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is scheduled to preside over discussions regarding “effective multilateralism” and a debate on the Middle East later in the month.

The United States has raised concerns regarding Russia’s continued presence on the UNSC as a permanent member, asserting that a nation that openly violates the UN Charter should not occupy such a position. White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre remarked on the predicament, stating that no viable legal pathway exists to remove Russia from this role despite its actions.

The Baltic states echoed similar sentiments, with Estonia’s UN envoy condemning Russia’s presidency as shameful and dangerous to the UNSC’s credibility. Lithuania’s Foreign Minister expressed sardonic congratulations to Russia, while the Lithuanian government’s communications division highlighted Russia’s actions against Ukraine.

Amidst these discussions, the U.S. ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, expressed expectations for Russia to behave professionally but also anticipated potential disinformation campaigns from the country. She emphasized the commitment to raising concerns regarding Russia’s conduct in Ukraine.

In conclusion, Ukraine, alongside various Western nations, has vocalized strong opposition to Russia’s presidency of the United Nations Security Council, emphasizing the implications such a position entails amidst ongoing hostilities stemming from Russia’s invasion. The situation highlights significant discontent regarding Russia’s role in global governance and raises questions about the efficacy of the UNSC as a credible institution against aggression. It underscores the need for international collaboration to address the conflict and reaffirm commitments to uphold international law.

Original Source: www.seychellesnewsagency.com