North Korea Confirms Ukraine War Involvement, Boosts Kim-Putin Relations

North Korea publicly confirmed its involvement in the Ukraine war, attributing its actions to an order from Kim Jong-un linked to a defense treaty with Russia. President Putin praised the contributions of North Korean forces, and Kim announced plans for a monument to honor fallen soldiers.

In a development that has raised eyebrows, North Korea has openly acknowledged its participation in the war in Ukraine. This admission, made on Monday, marks a significant shift as neither Moscow nor Pyongyang had previously confirmed North Korea’s involvement in the ongoing conflict. Reports indicate that North Korea’s actions were carried out under the directive of Kim Jong-un, referencing a defense treaty established with Russia.

State media in North Korea, KCNA, stated, “The operations for liberating the Kursk area to repel the adventurous invasion of the Russian Federation by the Ukrainian authorities were victoriously concluded.” This bold claim of success signals an intriguing turn in the narrative surrounding the war. Kim’s remarks also hint at the deepening ties between North Korea and Russia amidst shifting geopolitical landscapes.

Expressing his appreciation, Russian President Vladimir Putin remarked that he would always honor the “Korean heroes” alongside Russian forces who had fought for collective freedom. This collaboration paints a picture of unity against perceived Western aggression.

In a powerful symbol of remembrance, Kim Jong-un declared plans to erect a monument in Pyongyang honoring those who lost their lives in the conflict. This move includes laying flowers on the graves of fallen soldiers, a gesture that emphasizes the significance of war casualties in North Korea’s narrative.

North Korea’s recent admission regarding its role in the Ukraine conflict has sparked speculation about a possible summit between Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin. As both leaders strengthen their alliance amidst global tensions, the acknowledgment of war efforts and the memorialization of casualties marks a critical juncture for both nations. The geopolitical implications of this relationship continue to unfold, with potential ramifications for the broader international community.

Original Source: www.scmp.com